+ Free Consultations

(866) 814-3763
NYC Personal Injury Attorneys

New York’s Unique Fall Injury Protection

logo
construction accident lawyer Brooklyn, NY

A Law Unlike Anything in Other States

New York stands alone among all fifty states in offering construction workers a specific legal shield against elevation related injuries. Labor Law § 240, commonly called the Scaffold Law, imposes what courts describe as absolute liability on property owners and contractors when workers fall from heights or are struck by falling objects, and understanding how this law actually works can change the entire trajectory of a construction accident claim.

What Absolute Liability Actually Means

Once a worker establishes that a Scaffold Law violation occurred and proximately caused their injury, the property owner and contractor cannot avoid liability by arguing the worker was careless. This is a sharp departure from how most personal injury claims work in New York, where comparative negligence typically reduces a claimant’s recovery based on their own share of fault. Under Section 240, that defense generally does not apply.

  • Applies to elevation related risks: falls and falling objects
  • Owners and contractors bear liability regardless of comparative fault
  • One and two family homeowners are generally exempt if they did not direct the work
  • Liability requires a genuine safety device failure, not just an accident occurring

Why Not Every Fall Qualifies

Courts have been clear that a fall alone does not automatically prove a Scaffold Law violation. The New York Court of Appeals has explained that the statute targets the special hazards created by elevation differences and gravity, not every hazard present at a construction site. A worker who trips over debris at ground level, for example, is not automatically covered by Section 240, even though the same worker might have a claim under other legal theories.

What Actually Triggers Liability

The core question is whether a proper safety device, such as a secured ladder, scaffold, or harness system, was available and adequate for the task, and whether its absence or failure caused the injury. A worker using an unsecured ladder that slipped, or a scaffold that lacked proper guardrails, presents a stronger Section 240 case than one involving a hazard unrelated to height or gravity.

How This Interacts With Workers Compensation

Workers’ compensation provides limited benefits, generally covering medical expenses and a portion of lost wages, but it does not account for pain and suffering, future lost income, or long term disability. A Scaffold Law claim against a property owner or contractor, when the facts support it, can run alongside a workers’ compensation claim rather than replacing it. A Brooklyn construction accident lawyer evaluating a case looks at both avenues from the start, since combining them often produces a more complete recovery than either alone.

Coordinating the two claims requires some care, since a workers’ compensation lien can attach to proceeds recovered through a third party Scaffold Law claim. Understanding how that lien works, and negotiating it down where possible, becomes part of maximizing what a worker actually keeps from a combined recovery.

Common Scenarios That Fit This Law

Falls from ladders, scaffolds, roof edges, and elevated platforms make up the most common Scaffold Law claims. Objects that fall from a height and strike a worker below can also qualify, provided the object’s fall relates to the kind of gravity based risk the statute was written to address. A Brooklyn construction accident lawyer reviewing the specific circumstances of an incident determines early whether it fits within this framework or requires a different legal theory.

Building a Strong Claim From the Start

The Edelstein family has practiced law in New York since 1937, and construction accident cases have remained central to that work for decades. The Edelsteins, Faegenburg, & Blyakher LLP prepares every case as though it is going to trial, gathering the evidence needed to establish exactly what safety device was missing or failed before an insurer has the chance to argue otherwise, or to characterize a worker’s own conduct as the real cause of the fall.

SCHEDULE A CONSULTATION

Contact Us

The Edelsteins, Faegenburg, & Blyakher LLP